@InProceedings{CastroCarnCife:2018:UsViDi,
               author = "Castro, Jo{\~a}o Pedro de Carvalho and Carniel, Anderson Chaves 
                         and Ciferri, Cristina Dutra de Aguiar",
          affiliation = "{Universidade de S{\~a}o Paulo (USP)} and {Universidade de 
                         S{\~a}o Paulo (USP)} and {Universidade de S{\~a}o Paulo (USP)}",
                title = "A user-centric view of distributed spatial data management 
                         systems",
                 year = "2018",
               editor = "Vinhas, L{\'u}bia (INPE) and Campelo, Claudio (UFCG)",
                pages = "80--91",
         organization = "Simp{\'o}sio Brasileiro de Geoinform{\'a}tica, 19. (GEOINFO)",
            publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
              address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
             abstract = "Distributed spatial data management systems (DSDMSs) represent a 
                         new technology capable of managing huge volumes of spatial data 
                         using parallel and distributed frameworks. An increasing number of 
                         DSDMSs have been proposed in the literature, requiring a 
                         comparison among them. However, comparisons available in the 
                         literature only provide a system-centric view of DSDMSs, which is 
                         essentially based on performance evaluations. Thus, there is a 
                         lack of comparisons based on the user-centric view, which is aimed 
                         to help users to understand how the characteristics of DSDMSs are 
                         useful to meet the specific requirements of their spatial 
                         applications. In this paper, we fill this gap in the literature. 
                         We provide a user-centric comparison of Hadoop-GIS, SpatialHadoop, 
                         SpatialSpark, GeoSpark, SIMBA, LocationSpark, SparkGIS, and 
                         Elcano, using as a basis an extensive set of criteria related to 
                         the char- acteristics of spatial data handling and to the aspects 
                         inherent to distributed systems. Based on this comparison, we 
                         introduce a set of guidelines to help users to choose an 
                         appropriate DSDMS. We also describe a case study to illus- trate 
                         the use of these guidelines.",
  conference-location = "Campina Grande",
      conference-year = "05-07 dez. 2018",
                 issn = "2179-4847",
             language = "pt",
                  ibi = "8JMKD3MGPDW34P/3SEUQFS",
                  url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGPDW34P/3SEUQFS",
           targetfile = "p8.pdf",
        urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}